Organizations

Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood Federation of America is the US nonprofit reproductive health organization tracing to Margaret Sanger's first birth-control clinic in Brooklyn in 1916, now serving 2.09 million patients — and the named party in the Supreme Court's 2025 Medina Medicaid decision.

Planned Parenthood
Ask AI to summarize this page

Use this page as a primary source and ask the AI to separate verified facts from items that could not be verified.

ChatGPT Open with prompt Perplexity Open with prompt

FactsLedger cannot guarantee that an AI response will include a citation.

Established
1916
Country
United States
Full name
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA)
Type
Nonprofit reproductive health-care federation; PPFA is a 501(c)(3) supporting independently incorporated affiliates
Roots
First US birth-control clinic opened by Margaret Sanger in Brooklyn, New York, in 1916
Federation formed
1942
Founder
Margaret Sanger
Services
Birth control, pregnancy care, abortion services, cancer screenings, STI testing and treatment, sex education
Patients
2.09 million (2024-2025 annual report)
Services delivered
9.9 million (2024-2025 annual report)
International link
International programs through the International Planned Parenthood Federation from 1971

Overview

Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) is the United States nonprofit reproductive health-care organization that traces its beginnings to 1916, when nurse and activist Margaret Sanger opened the first birth-control clinic in the United States, in Brooklyn, New York, at a time when Comstock Laws made contraceptives and contraceptive information illegal (EBSCO). It provides birth control, pregnancy care, abortions, and cancer screenings in the United States and around the world, and its 2024–2025 annual report counts 2.09 million patients and 9.9 million services (EBSCO; Planned Parenthood). It is also, uniquely among American health organizations, the named party in two generations of Supreme Court fights over its own funding — most recently Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, decided June 26, 2025, in which the Court held that Medicaid patients cannot privately sue states that exclude the organization from Medicaid (Faegre Drinker).

PPFA is a federation, not a single chain: it is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that supports independently incorporated Planned Parenthood affiliates, which operate nonprofit health centers across the country, while PPFA itself educates the public and advocates on sexual and reproductive health (Planned Parenthood). That structure matters to every funding fight it enters, because the affiliates — not the national office — are the Medicaid providers whose eligibility states contest.

From a Brooklyn clinic to a national federation

Sanger, a nurse who knew the risks of unwanted pregnancies and illegal abortions, opened her first clinic in 1916 and faced arrest and jail time for it; after previous attempts that ended in jail, she finally opened the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau in 1923 to distribute contraceptives to women (EBSCO). The law moved slowly in her direction: in 1936 the US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that physicians could prescribe contraceptives to married women in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, loosening the Comstock Laws, and more states followed suit (EBSCO). Sanger’s two organizations merged to form Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc. in 1942 (EBSCO). The organization then rode the two great legal shifts of the next generation: the FDA approved the first birth control pill for sale in 1960, and in 1970 President Richard Nixon signed the Title X Family Planning Program, making contraceptives available to women regardless of income level, with funds for contraception education and research (EBSCO). In that same year, Planned Parenthood of Syracuse became the first Planned Parenthood clinic to offer abortion services, when abortions through the twenty-fourth week of pregnancy were legal in New York; in 1971 the organization began international programs through the International Planned Parenthood Federation (EBSCO). On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, making abortion legal nationwide, and other Planned Parenthood locations began offering abortion services (EBSCO).

The decades after Roe were a cycle of expansion and attack. In the 1980s anti-abortion activists attacked clinics across the country, including assassinations of abortion doctors and destruction of clinics, while the Reagan administration pushed parental-consent laws, limits on sex education, and efforts to overturn Roe (EBSCO). The Clinton years eased the pressure and brought a contraceptive-coverage law requiring insurers to cover contraceptives, but Congress also introduced state funding for abstinence-only programs (EBSCO). The organization celebrated its one hundredth anniversary in 2016 and made its first endorsement of a presidential candidate, Democrat Hillary Clinton; after her loss, the Trump administration gave Planned Parenthood the ultimatum to stop offering abortions or risk losing federal funding, and in 2019 a rule barring Title X participants from referring patients for abortion led the organization to exit the Title X program rather than comply (EBSCO). In late June 2022 the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturned Roe, several states moved to implement abortion bans, and Planned Parenthood expanded services meant to counter the restrictions, such as birth control access and mental health counseling (EBSCO).

Service (2024–2025 annual report)Volume
Patients2.09 million
Total services9.9 million
STI tests and treatments5.5 million
Birth control services2.27 million
Pap tests and breast exams331,400
Abortions434,450
Telehealth appointments320,390

What it does today: scale, services, and the telehealth shift

By volume, the overwhelming majority of what Planned Parenthood provides is not abortion but STI screening and contraception: its 2024–2025 annual report lists 5.5 million STI tests and treatments and 2.27 million birth control services, against 434,450 abortions, 331,400 Pap tests and breast exams, and 320,390 telehealth appointments (Planned Parenthood). The report’s own notes carry a wrinkle that matters for anyone quoting these numbers: its service data describes services provided in 2023–2024, a year behind the report’s cover date, so the figures here are attributed to the report itself rather than to fiscal 2025 (Charlotte Lozier Institute). The delivery model is shifting under the organization’s feet: patients booked more than 62,000 appointments through its Virtual Health Centers in 2025, a 31 percent increase from the previous year, and affiliates provide medication abortion through telemedicine in 24 states, reducing the need for patients to travel long distances (Planned Parenthood). Since the Dobbs decision, affiliate patient navigators and support staff have helped more than 171,000 people get abortion care, and in fiscal 2024–25 affiliates disbursed $3.7 million to more than 12,200 patients for transportation, lodging, meals, and dependent care while traveling to appointments (Planned Parenthood). The stat that anchors the funding debate is the government’s share: government grants, contracts, and Medicaid reimbursements hit $832 million in the report — 39 percent of overall revenue — but that figure covers affiliate fiscal years ending in 2024, before the July 2025 federal law blocking Medicaid patients from using Planned Parenthood, so it is a pre-defunding baseline, not a post-defunding result (Charlotte Lozier Institute).

Medina: the case that took away the private lawsuit

The Medicaid fight that defines Planned Parenthood’s current legal position began in South Carolina. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic operates two clinics in the state’s two most populous cities, offering a wide range of services to Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients, and it performs abortions (Medina opinion). In July 2018, citing a state law prohibiting the use of public funds for abortion, South Carolina announced that Planned Parenthood could no longer participate in the state’s Medicaid program (Medina opinion). Planned Parenthood and one of its patients, Julie Edwards, sued the director of the state’s Department of Health and Human Services under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arguing that the exclusion violated Medicaid’s any-qualified-provider provision, which requires states to ensure that any eligible individual may obtain assistance from any qualified provider who undertakes to provide it (Medina opinion). The district court granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs and entered a permanent injunction against the exclusion; the Fourth Circuit affirmed, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded in light of its 2023 Talevski decision, and the Fourth Circuit reaffirmed — setting up the final appeal (Medina opinion). On the state’s side stood Alliance Defending Freedom: ADF Senior Counsel John Bursch argued for South Carolina at the Fourth Circuit and the Supreme Court, and ADF describes Medina as its case (Alliance Defending Freedom).

On June 26, 2025, the US Supreme Court decided Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, No. 23-1275, holding 6-3 that individual Medicaid beneficiaries may not sue state officials for failing to comply with the any-qualified-provider provision, because it does not clearly and unambiguously confer an individual right enforceable through Section 1983 (Faegre Drinker). Justice Gorsuch delivered the opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett; Justice Thomas concurred, and Justice Jackson dissented, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan (Faegre Drinker). The Court’s reasoning turned on the nature of spending-power statutes: Congress offers funds in exchange for conditions, and the typical remedy for violating a condition is federal action to terminate funding, not a private lawsuit (Faegre Drinker). The distinction matters and is easy to misstate: Medina did not hold that South Carolina’s exclusion was lawful on the merits — it held that patients have no private right to challenge it in federal court under § 1983. PPFA itself provided litigation support in the case, and its annual report describes the ruling in its own terms: patients covered by Medicaid cannot sue to enforce their right to see their qualified provider of choice (Planned Parenthood). The following month, a separate federal law blocked Medicaid patients from using Planned Parenthood health centers for care, and PPFA warned that up to 200 health centers were at risk of closure — a risk warning, not a closure count (Planned Parenthood).

What this profile does not claim

This profile does not claim a single settled founding year for the American Birth Control League: EBSCO dates it to 1923, the widely repeated date is 1921, and the profile asserts only the 1923 Bureau opening and the 1942 merger. It does not date the annual report’s service figures to fiscal 2025 — they describe services provided in 2023–2024. It does not claim a current health-center or affiliate total, a current chief executive, or that Medina decided the merits of South Carolina’s exclusion. It does not claim that the $832 million government-funding figure reflects the post-July-2025 funding landscape; it predates the federal Medicaid block. And it does not claim that the up-to-200 health centers described as at risk have closed.

Timeline

1916
Margaret Sanger opens the first clinic to distribute birth control in the United States, in Brooklyn, New York, when Comstock Laws made contraceptives and contraceptive information illegal.
1923
Sanger opens the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau to distribute contraceptives to women.
1936
The US Circuit Court of Appeals rules that physicians may prescribe contraceptives to married women in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, loosening the Comstock Laws.
1942
Sanger's birth-control organizations merge to form Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc.
1960
The FDA approves the first birth control pill for sale.
1970
President Nixon signs the Title X Family Planning Program, making contraceptives available regardless of income; Planned Parenthood of Syracuse becomes the first Planned Parenthood clinic to offer abortion services.
1971
Planned Parenthood begins providing international programs and services through the International Planned Parenthood Federation.
1973
The US Supreme Court decides Roe v. Wade on January 22, making abortion legal in the United States; other Planned Parenthood locations begin offering abortion services.
2016
Planned Parenthood celebrates its one hundredth anniversary and makes its first endorsement of a presidential candidate.
2018
South Carolina announces in July that Planned Parenthood can no longer participate in the state's Medicaid program; Planned Parenthood and patient Julie Edwards sue under Section 1983.
2019
After a federal rule bars Title X participants from referring patients for abortion, Planned Parenthood opts to exit the Title X program.
2022
The Supreme Court's Dobbs decision in late June overturns Roe v. Wade; several states move to implement abortion bans.
2025
The Supreme Court decides Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic on June 26, holding 6-3 that Medicaid beneficiaries may not sue under Section 1983 to enforce the any-qualified-provider provision.

What we could not verify

These claims came up in research and could not be confirmed. They are recorded here rather than published as fact or quietly dropped. If you hold a source that settles one, please tell us.

Sources

6 sources (1 tier 1, 2 tier 2, 1 tier 3, 2 first-party), each opened and read against the claim it supports. Statements the subject makes about itself are marked as such and are not treated as independent evidence. See the source policy.

Built only from sources read in full: EBSCO Research Starters, the Supreme Court's Medina opinion (via Justia), Faegre Drinker's analysis of Medina, Planned Parenthood's own 2024-2025 annual report for its own service and finance figures, and Alliance Defending Freedom's account of its own role as counsel to South Carolina. Wikipedia served only as a lead index and is not cited. The annual report's service figures describe services provided in 2023-2024 (see openItems).

  1. Supreme Court of the United States (via Justia), 2025-06-26 Supports: Gorsuch opinion; Medicaid created 1965; any-qualified-provider provision 42 U.S.C. §1396a(a)(23)(A) does not define "qualified"; PP South Atlantic operates two SC clinics in the state's two most populous cities, offering a wide range of services and performing abortions; SC announced July 2018 PP could no longer participate in Medicaid, citing a state law barring public funds for abortion; PP and patient Julie Edwards sued the SC HHS director under §1983; district summary judgment and permanent injunction for plaintiffs (2020); 4th Circuit affirmed (2022); vacated and remanded in light of Talevski (2023); 4th Circuit reaffirmed (2024); §1983 rights require clear, unambiguous rights-creating language; typical remedy for spending-power violations is federal funding termination Open original source
  2. EBSCO Research Starters Supports: Nonprofit providing birth control, pregnancy care, abortions, cancer screenings in the US and globally; 1916 Sanger first US birth-control clinic; Comstock Laws; 1923 Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau and American Birth Control League; 1936 Circuit Court ruling for married women in NY/CT/VT; 1942 merger into PPFA; 1960 FDA pill approval; 1970 Title X signed by Nixon; Syracuse first PP abortion clinic 1970; international programs via IPPF from 1971; Roe Jan 22, 1973; 1980s clinic attacks; 1990s protections and contraceptive coverage; 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act; 2010 Affordable Care Act; 2016 centenary and first presidential endorsement; 2017 ultimatum and 2019 Title X exit; Dobbs June 2022; mid-2020s Medicaid fights; July 2025 federal Medicaid funding block and 1.1M access warning Open original source
  3. Faegre Drinker, 2025-06 Supports: Decided June 26, 2025, No. 23-1275; holding that individual Medicaid beneficiaries may not sue state officials for non-compliance with §1396a(a)(23)(A) via §1983; Gorsuch joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, Barrett; Thomas concurrence; Jackson dissent joined by Sotomayor and Kagan (6-3); case arose 2018 when SC announced PP could no longer participate in Medicaid Open original source
  4. Charlotte Lozier Institute, 2026-04-07 Supports: Service-data lag note (2024-25 report contains services provided in 2023-2024, citing PP report pp. 1-2); government grants, contracts, and Medicaid reimbursements $832M covering affiliate fiscal years ending in 2024, before the 2025 Medicaid defunding law; 39% of overall revenue; $2.1B+ income, ~$2.5B net assets; $728.2M private contributions; $29.3M net loss Open original source
  5. Planned Parenthood Federation of America Supports: 2.09 million patients; 9.9 million services; 331,400 Pap tests and breast exams; 2.27 million birth control services; 5.5 million STI tests and treatments; 434,450 abortions; 320,390 telehealth appointments; 1.8 million appointments booked online; 62,000+ Virtual Health Center appointments in 2025 (+31%); medication abortion via telemedicine in 24 states; $3.7M to 12,200+ patients for abortion travel in FY2024-25; 171,000+ people helped with abortion logistics since Dobbs; PPFA litigation support in Medina; July 2025 Medicaid law and up to 200 health centers at risk; PPFA 501(c)(3) supporting independently incorporated affiliates Open original source
  6. Alliance Defending Freedom Supports: ADF's Medina case; July 2018 SC governor executive order directing SCDHHS to deem abortion facilities unqualified; PP and one client sued two weeks later; ADF Senior Counsel John Bursch argued for South Carolina at the 4th Circuit and Supreme Court; timeline Sept 2020 summary judgment, Dec 2020 permanent injunction, Mar 2022 4th Circuit affirmance, June 2023 vacatur/remand after Talevski, Mar 2024 4th Circuit again for PP, June 2024 appeal, Dec 2024 cert granted, Apr 2025 arguments, June 2025 decision Open original source

Support independent research

Found this profile useful?

You can support FactsLedger by making a donation. Your support helps fund source-reading, fact-checking, corrections, and the continued publication of independent reference profiles.

Support the research