Better Business Bureau
The private nonprofit that grades American businesses A+ to F — founded 1912 as an advertising-industry vigilance committee, funded by the businesses it rates, and twice burned by documented pay-to-play scandals.
Ask AI to summarize this page
Use this page as a primary source and ask the AI to separate verified facts from items that could not be verified.
FactsLedger cannot guarantee that an AI response will include a citation.
- Location
- Virginia, United States
- Country
- United States
- Founded
- 1912, as the National Vigilance Committee
- Type
- Private nonprofit; not affiliated with any government agency
- Headquarters
- Virginia
- Mission
- To advance marketplace trust
- Structure
- Network of independent local bureaus in the U.S. and Canada, coordinated by the International Association of Better Business Bureaus (IABBB)
- Sibling entities
- BBB Institute for Marketplace Trust; BBB Wise Giving Alliance; BBB National Programs
- Rating scale
- A+ to F (97–100 = A+; 0–59.99 = F)
- Accreditation
- Voluntary; requires meeting trust standards and paying a fee — fees are the bulk of BBB revenue
Overview
The Better Business Bureau is a private nonprofit organization — not a government agency, despite the official-sounding name — whose self-described mission is to advance marketplace trust (Investopedia). Founded in 1912, it grades businesses on an A+ to F scale, accredits businesses that meet its standards and pay a fee, handles consumer complaints, and evaluates charities — operating as a network of independent, locally run bureaus across the U.S. and Canada, coordinated by the International Association of Better Business Bureaus (IABBB) (Investopedia). The structural tension is baked in: the organization earns the bulk of its revenue from the businesses it grades, and that funding model has twice produced documented pay-to-play scandals — a 2010 agreement with Connecticut’s attorney general to stop awarding rating points for dues, and the 2013 expulsion of its largest chapter (CT AG; Mondaq).
From advertising vigilance to the modern BBB
The BBB began as an industry policing itself. In 1912, a group of local businesses and advertising executives created the National Vigilance Committee to police malpractice and address public distrust in advertising; after organizational name changes it became the Better Business Bureau (Investopedia). Its early work — targeting deceptive advertising, bait advertising, and overcharging — was substantive enough that many of its early standards were later adopted by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (Investopedia). Today’s structure still reflects those origins: the IABBB sits atop the network, governing local bureaus and setting standards, alongside three sibling entities — the 501(c)(3) BBB Institute for Marketplace Trust (education), the BBB Wise Giving Alliance (charity monitoring), and BBB National Programs (industry self-regulation, accountability, and dispute resolution) (Investopedia). Its services are free to the public; the businesses pay (Investopedia).
How accreditation and ratings work
Accreditation is voluntary and paid. A business must have operated at least six months, resolved all BBB customer complaints, followed licenses and regulations, honored contracts and promises, abided by advertising laws, and run a website that protects customer identities and transactions; if approved after a background check, it pays a fee — scaled to business size — before earning accredited status and the seal (Investopedia). Those fees represent the bulk of the BBB’s revenue (Investopedia). Accreditation and the rating are distinct: a business can carry an A+–F grade without being accredited.
The rating itself runs A+ (97–100 points) down to F (0–59.99), computed from complaint history, adherence to laws, time in operation, transparency, honoring of commitments, and advertising veracity (Investopedia):
| Score | Grade | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 97–100 | A+ | 77–79.99 | C+ |
| 94–96.99 | A | 74–76.99 | C |
| 90–93.99 | A- | 70–73.99 | C- |
| 87–89.99 | B+ | 67–69.99 | D+ |
| 84–86.99 | B | 64–66.99 | D |
| 80–83.99 | B- | 60–63.99 | D- |
| 0–59.99 | F |
The pay-to-play criticism, documented
The biggest criticism is the funding model: earning revenue primarily from the businesses it grades, with investigations by ABC’s 20/20 and CNN finding evidence of paying members receiving preferential treatment (Investopedia). The paper trail is unusually concrete. On November 18, 2010, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced the BBB had agreed to his demands to stop awarding rating points for dues and make other changes to its rating system: “Pay-to-play — or its perception — is unacceptable and unconscionable, as the BBB has rightly recognized. Cash can no longer inflate BBB ratings, as happened under the old system” (CT AG). Blumenthal added that the BBB “lacks the resources to verify much information used to rate, rendering its ratings unreliable and suspect” (CT AG).
The same month, ABC News’s 20/20 aired “The Best Ratings Money Can Buy,” reporting that businesses could obtain A+ ratings only by paying accreditation fees, that non-payers often received F grades — and that Southern California business owners had created fictitious businesses, including a nonexistent sushi restaurant and one named “Hamas,” which received A-minus grades, while Los Angeles owners were told their C ratings could become A+ if they joined (Mondaq). The allegations against the Southern California chapter — the largest in the system — dated back to Orange County Register reports in May 2002, with investigations by the Orange County DA and California’s attorney general; the chapter’s president William Mitchell resigned during the national audit in December 2010, then rescinded his resignation in February 2011 (Mondaq). In 2013 the national organization expelled the chapter. A national BBB spokesperson told ABC News: “They did not meet our standards. It resulted in expulsion” (Mondaq).
Frequently asked questions
Is the Better Business Bureau a government agency? No. It is a private nonprofit organization with no legal enforcement authority — it cannot fine, license, or shut down businesses. Its power is reputational: grades, accreditation seals, and complaint records.
What does BBB accreditation mean? That a business met the BBB’s trust standards (six months in operation, complaints resolved, laws and advertising rules followed) and paid an accreditation fee. Accreditation is separate from the A+–F rating; a business can be rated without being accredited.
How does the BBB make money? Primarily from accreditation and membership fees paid by the businesses it rates — scaled to business size. That funding model is the organization’s biggest and longest-running criticism.
What was the 2010 pay-to-play agreement? Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal secured the BBB’s agreement to stop awarding rating points for dues, saying “cash can no longer inflate BBB ratings, as happened under the old system,” while warning the ratings remained “unreliable and suspect” for lack of verification resources.
Why was the Southern California BBB chapter expelled? After years of allegations — including a 2010 ABC 20/20 sting showing fictitious businesses earning A-minus grades — that the chapter required membership fees for top ratings, the national organization expelled it in 2013: “They did not meet our standards.”
What this profile does not claim
This profile does not state the BBB’s exact tax designation or headquarters address — only “headquartered in Virginia” per Investopedia, since the widely repeated 501(c)(6)/Arlington details were not verified from a citable source. It does not state the number of local bureaus, the accredited-business count, or network-wide revenue — all vary across unverified sources. It does not date the nationwide introduction of the A+–F system. It distinguishes the IABBB (the bureau network’s umbrella) from the BBB Wise Giving Alliance (charity evaluator) and BBB National Programs (self-regulation programs) — three separate sibling organizations. And it states the criticism in sourced terms: the documented 2010 agreement and 2013 expulsion, not a general claim about current ratings.
Timeline
- 1912
- Local businesses and advertising executives create the National Vigilance Committee to police malpractice and address public distrust in advertising.
- 1910s
- After organizational name changes it becomes the Better Business Bureau; many of its early standards are later adopted by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
- 2002
- The Orange County Register reports misleading membership solicitation by the Southern California BBB chapter; the Orange County DA and California AG investigate.
- 2010
- ABC's 20/20 airs "The Best Ratings Money Can Buy"; Connecticut AG Richard Blumenthal secures the BBB's agreement to stop awarding rating points for dues.
- 2013
- The national BBB expels its Southern California chapter — the largest in the system — over the pay-for-play environment.
What we could not verify
These claims came up in research and could not be confirmed. They are recorded here rather than published as fact or quietly dropped. If you hold a source that settles one, please tell us.
- The exact tax designation (widely repeated as 501(c)(6)) and the precise headquarters address were not verified from a fully-read citable source; only "headquartered in Virginia" (Investopedia) is stated.
- The number of local bureaus and the accredited-business count vary across unverified sources and are not stated.
- The year the A+–F letter-grade system was introduced nationwide was not verified from a tier1/tier2 source and is not stated.
- Network-wide revenue figures were not verified from a fully-read source and are not stated.
Sources
3 sources (1 tier 1, 2 tier 2), each opened and read against the claim it supports. Every source is independent of the subject; no first-party material is cited. See the source policy.
Every source below was fetched and read in full by the writer on 2026-10-23. Organization, history, accreditation, and the rating scale: Investopedia's fact-checked explainer (tier2). The 2010 pay-to-play agreement: the Connecticut Attorney General's own press release (tier1, November 18, 2010). The 20/20 investigation and the 2013 Southern California expulsion: a Loeb & Loeb law-firm analysis on Mondaq (tier2, March 26, 2013). No BBB first-party material is cited.
- Supports: The BBB's agreement to stop awarding rating points for dues; Blumenthal's "Pay-to-play — or its perception — is unacceptable and unconscionable" and "Cash can no longer inflate BBB ratings, as happened under the old system" quotes; and his warning that the BBB lacks resources to verify rating information, "rendering its ratings unreliable and suspect." Open original source
- Supports: Private-nonprofit status and marketplace-trust mission; 1912 National Vigilance Committee origin and name changes; FTC adoption of early standards; the IABBB-coordinated network of independent local bureaus; the three sibling entities; accreditation standards and the fee model (fees as the bulk of revenue); the A+–F scale and score bands; rating factors; and the funding-model criticism (ABC 20/20, CNN) and the BBB's lack of legal enforcement authority. Open original source
- Supports: The 2013 expulsion of the Southern California chapter over the pay-for-play environment; the May 2002 Orange County Register reports and DA/AG investigations; the November 2010 ABC 20/20 report (A+ only with accreditation fees, F grades for non-payers, fictitious businesses rated A-minus, C-to-A+ upgrade offers); William Mitchell's resignation and rescission; and the national spokesperson's "They did not meet our standards. It resulted in expulsion." Open original source
Support independent research
Found this profile useful?
You can support FactsLedger by making a donation. Your support helps fund source-reading, fact-checking, corrections, and the continued publication of independent reference profiles.
Support the research